Skip to content
SteepGraph

Data Migration

Teamcenter to Aras Migration: A Guide to First-Time-Right (FTR) Execution

A functionality-first, First-Time-Right approach to migration planning that allows for timely delivery, appropriate quality, and cost optimisation.

Tajagna HirparaPLM BU Head, Aras


3 min read

Illustration of engineering data funnelling from Teamcenter into Aras

While many manufacturing organisations seek to modernise away from legacy PDM technologies such as Teamcenter, Aras Innovator presents a flexible, open alternative. However, there are always risks associated with migration. At SteepGraph, we represent a functionality-first, and First-Time-Right (FTR) approach to migration planning, which allows for timely delivery, appropriate quality, and cost optimisation.

In this article, we describe our proven functionality-based migration process from Teamcenter to Aras.

Why Functionality-First?

Most groups we work with have a narrow focus on data migration, i.e. data transfer, while underestimating or forgetting how critical process and functional parity is for an appropriate and timely transition of work. We have seen this outcome lead to several organisations misaligned with expectations, a lot of unexpected rework, and cost overruns. Instead, we focus on functional footprint first:

  • What does Teamcenter do for you today?
  • What of those capabilities do you want to reimplement, enhance, or omit in Aras?
  • What is the process parity or improvement opportunity we can accomplish for your organisation? And what is the minimum amount of customisation that is required?

This minimises complexity, reduces time-to-delivery, and helps to set you up for scalable opportunities in the future.

Our Migration Strategy (Function-Focused)

1. Project Planning

  • Identify stakeholders, confirm success KPIs: (time, quality, cost)
  • Freeze functional module scope

2. Functional Inventory & Mapping

  • Document the Teamcenter modules currently in use.
  • Map Teamcenter modules to the corresponding Aras ItemTypes, workflows, and forms
  • For every function, categorise them as OOTB / Config / Custom in Aras.

3. Fitment & Gap Analysis

  • Identify what functionality is missing or processes have been over-engineering.
  • Suggest adopting an OOTB-first and leaner alternative approach.

4. Module Implementation

  • Create the Aras configuration module by module: (e.g. BOM, Change, Workflow, etc.)
  • Reuse templates, reusable scripts and design governance checkpoints.

5. Validation and FTR reviews

  • Conduct peer reviews, early UATs with stakeholder validations.
  • Provide structured Gate Reviews to ensure project quality.

Governance for FTR Delivery

GateWhenWhat’s reviewedOutcome
Gate 0 – Planning ReviewPost kick-offResources, risks, stakeholder alignmentRobust project plan
Gate 1 – Functional MappingAfter mapping completionAccuracy, completeness, business validationSign-off from business
Gate 2 – Design ReviewBefore build startsBlueprint review, solution feasibilitySign-off from product owner
Gate 3 – Pre-UAT ReviewPost testingDefect analysis, test coverageUAT go-ahead
Gate 4 – Project ClosureBefore final handoffLessons learned, documentation, stabilityClosure approval

Best Practices for Time and Cost Optimisation

  • OOTB First: Utilise what Aras provides OOTB and configure when needed
  • Modular Delivery: Tackle the functionality area-by-area (BOM, Change, Workflow)
  • Template-Based System Build: Reusability of Aras configuration and libraries
  • Effort Estimating efforts via T-shirt sizing: Classifying modules as S/M/L/XL will provide greater predictability

Risks & Considerations

RiskImpactLikelihoodMitigation
Over-customizationHighMediumStart with OOTB fitment and review all custom proposals
Process driftMediumHighValidate business process alignment early
User resistanceMediumHighEarly demos, user training, and involvement in mapping
Integration gapsHighMediumParallel mock tests for interface revalidation

Prepare Functional Equivalents Tables (A Sample Mapping Table)

Teamcenter functionalityAras equivalent
Item ManagementAras custom ItemTypes
BOM ManagementAras Part/BOM structure
Change Management (ECO, ECN)Aras Change Items with workflow
ClassificationAras Classification Tree
Workflow TemplatesAras Lifecycles & Workflows
Access ControlAras Permissions + Identities

Summary

Migrating from Teamcenter to Aras can be a ground-breaking change – if done correctly. Our FTR-based, functionality-driven methodology means you won’t just replicate the old, but will rethink with intent.

Whether you’re a manufacturer with complex BOM and change processes, SteepGraph’s migration template provides:

  • Process capability preserved without unnecessary customisation
  • Fast, phased implementation through templates
  • Cost-effective, future-ready platform adoption

By focusing on functionality-first execution and proven migration governance, manufacturers can reduce risk and accelerate their transition to Aras, while laying the foundation for future scalability.

Filed under

  • Aras Innovator
  • Teamcenter
  • Implementation

About the author

Tajagna Hirpara

PLM BU Head, Aras, SteepGraph

The services behind this article, and an expert to talk to about your own programme.

Talk to a PLM expert

We’d like to use Google Analytics cookies to understand how visitors use this site. No analytics cookies are set unless you accept. Privacy Policy