CATIA V5 → Aras Innovator
Europe · Automotive OEM
CAD assembly metadata lands in Aras straight from the CATIA interface, with the manual re-keying designed out.
Platform-Independent
A configuration-driven framework to connect enterprise systems and orchestrate business operations.
Six systems, one layer — every exchange flows through the framework, not point to point.
Connecting Business Processes
Product information rarely moves in a straight line. It runs from engineering to the plant floor, out to suppliers, back again, and on to customers — across systems that were never designed to agree.
Integration Challenges
Point-to-point does not scale. Ten systems wired directly is forty-five interfaces to build, test and maintain, and every system added multiplies them again. The fix isn’t another connector — it’s moving every exchange onto one configurable integration framework: reusable, monitored, and governed.
Move Beyond Hardcoded Integrations
Connectivity → Transformation → Orchestration → Monitoring → Runtime. Each layer replaces something you would otherwise hardcode.
Connect anything, anywhere — instead of wiring every system to every other.
Translate meaning between systems — instead of hardcoding business logic into each interface.
Coordinate, not just connect — instead of rebuilding the same logic in every new interface.
See and control every exchange — instead of limited monitoring and high maintenance.
A secure, extensible foundation — instead of vendor dependency.
Build integrations once. Configure, extend, monitor, and scale them across the enterprise.
Integration Expertise
How it fits together
In the product
Systems, flows and mappings, as the framework shows them.
Integration Platform
Processing Volume
Recent Alerts (Failed Messages)
| Timestamp (UTC) | Flow | Error Message |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-14 09:15:33 | 3DX to ASAP BOM Sync | ASAP MATERIAL HTTP 500 |
| 2026-08-14 08:48:17 | 3DX to ASAP BOM Sync | ASAP BOM aborted: parent material sync failed |
| 2026-08-14 02:54:57 | 3DX to ASAP BOM Sync | Mapping error: required field AES_ITEM_NAME missing |
System Configurations
| System Name | Application | Auth Method | Username |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enovia PLM | 3DX | BASIC | 3DEXP01 |
| Odoo | ODOO | BASIC | admin@cif.local |
System Health
| System | Status |
|---|---|
| Enovia PLM | DOWN |
| Odoo | DOWN |
Edit Integration Flow
3DX to ASAP BOM Sync
Basic Info
Source System
Target System
BOM Mapping
Integration Flows
| Flow Name | Source System | Target System | Category | Status | Processing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3DX to ASAP BOM Sync | Enovia PLM | Odoo | EBOM | ACTIVE | SYNCHRONOUS |
| 3DX to Odoo Doc Sync | Enovia PLM | Odoo | MODEL | ACTIVE | SYNCHRONOUS |
Attribute Mapping Configuration
Map attributes from 3DX to ERP
| Source Field | Target Field | Transform |
|---|---|---|
['PLMEntity.PLM_ExternalID'] | default_code | None |
['PLMEntity.V_Name'] | name | None |
['PLMEntity.V_description'] | description | None |
Source System
Target System
Job History
Success Rate96.73%
| Flow Name | Status | Duration | Retries | Summary |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3DX to ASAP BOM Sync | SUCCESS | 930ms | No retries | BOM 208912851 updated (ECO 862894858): lines re-synced |
| 3DX to Odoo Doc Sync | SUCCESS | 646ms | No retries | Drawing DRW-290311 released; .tif fetched and synced to Odoo |
| 3DX to ASAP BOM Sync | IN_PROGRESS | N/A | No retries | Queued for target processing |
| 3DX to ASAP BOM Sync | ERROR | 1.11s | No retries | Error: ASAP MATERIAL HTTP 500 |
| 3DX to ASAP BOM Sync | SUCCESS | 1.04s | 1 retry | Retry succeeded for 208961031 |
System Reports
07/01/2026 – 08/31/2026
Integration Metrics
| Flow Name | Success Rate (%) | Failure Rate (%) | Avg Execution Time (s) | Total Volume |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3DX to ASAP BOM Sync | 89.38 | 10.62 | 1.44 | 250 |
| 3DX to Odoo Doc Sync | 81.07 | 18.93 | 0.98 | 261 |
Retry Success Rate
| Flow Name | Total Retries | Successful | Failed | Success Rate (%) | Pending |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3DX to ASAP BOM Sync | 1 | 1 | 0 | 100.00 | 1 |
| 3DX to Odoo Doc Sync | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0.00 | 0 |
Resources
Four integrations already running in production.
Customer stories
Europe · Automotive OEM
CAD assembly metadata lands in Aras straight from the CATIA interface, with the manual re-keying designed out.
Oil & Gas
A custom ONEPART connector across two PDM systems, extraction aware of each system’s access control.
USA · Electronics
Four business systems carried inside one Aras estate, supported since 2010.
Denmark · EPC
Two thousand suppliers inside the workflow, with an MVP live in a month.
Get Started
Tell us the systems you need to connect — PLM, ERP, MES, CAD, ALM, cloud, or legacy — and we’ll scope the integration with you.
The service behind the framework
The framework is the tooling. The service is the team that runs it—nine steps from business discovery to continuous optimisation.
FAQ
Yes — PLM ↔ ERP is the flow we build most often: parts, BOMs, documents, materials and engineering changes kept in step, in both directions. SAP, Oracle, Microsoft Dynamics, Epicor, IFS and Odoo are already connected.
Very likely. The systems shown are the ones already built and in production, not a limit. Connecting a new platform is a configuration exercise against the framework’s existing connectivity layer rather than a new integration built from scratch. Tell us the system and we will confirm what it needs.
Your team can. Flows are configured rather than coded, so building and changing them is an administrative task once the framework is in place, and we train your people to do it. Most customers keep us for the first integrations and the architecture decisions, then run day-to-day changes themselves.
Integrations are configured against the framework rather than hardcoded into each system, so a source or target upgrade is a mapping change, not a rebuild. Monitoring shows what stopped behaving as expected, and the reusable logic stays in place.
Authentication and role management are part of the runtime platform, and execution history and audit logs record what moved, when, and what failed — so a question asked months later has an answer. Where policy requires it, the framework runs entirely inside your own environment.
Either. It can run in your own environment — on-premises or your cloud — or be hosted by SteepGraph. Customers with controlled data or strict network policies generally keep it in-house; the framework works the same way in both.
Both. The framework is available on a subscription or a perpetual licence, and which one fits usually depends on whether your integration landscape is a fixed scope or something you expect to keep extending.